Information on Result #1858281

There is no (89, 2829)-sequence in base 32, because net from sequence would yield (89, m, 2830)-net in base 32 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 2829)-sequence in base 32 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (89, m, 2829)-net in base 32 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (89, 2829)-sequence over F32 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (89, m, 2829)-net over F32 with m > ∞ [i]