Information on Result #1855287

There is no (25, m, 1691)-net in base 64 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (25, 1689, 1691)-net in base 64, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (25, 1690)-sequence in base 64 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (25, 25+k, 1691)-net in base 64 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (25, m, 1691)-net in base 64 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (25, 25+k, 1691)-net over F64 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (25, m, 1691)-net over F64 with unbounded m [i]