Information on Result #1858424

There is no (25, 1690)-sequence in base 64, because net from sequence would yield (25, m, 1691)-net in base 64 for arbitrarily large m, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (25, 1690)-sequence in base 64 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]Logical Equivalence (for Sequences)
2No (25, m, 1690)-net in base 64 with m > ∞ [i]
3No digital (25, 1690)-sequence over F64 (for arbitrarily large k) [i]
4No digital (25, m, 1690)-net over F64 with m > ∞ [i]