Information on Result #2452105
Linear OOA(9125, 65, F9, 2, 110) (dual of [(65, 2), 5, 111]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(9125, 65, F9, 2, 111) (dual of [(65, 2), 5, 112]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(913, 9, F9, 2, 13) (dual of [(9, 2), 5, 14]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;5,9) [i]
- linear OOA(9107, 56, F9, 2, 97) (dual of [(56, 2), 5, 98]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(951, 28, F9, 2, 48) (dual of [(28, 2), 5, 49]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(951, 28, F9, 2, 48) (dual of [(28, 2), 5, 49]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(913, 9, F9, 2, 13) (dual of [(9, 2), 5, 14]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.