Information on Result #3018765
There is no (29, 72, 64)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (29, 71, 64)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2647 275124 346222 499685 > 271 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.