Information on Result #466988
There is no (29, 71, 64)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2647 275124 346222 499685 > 271
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (29, 72, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |