Information on Result #3019367
There is no (32, 95, 64)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (32, 94, 64)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24858 643917 398505 199802 146525 > 294 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.