Information on Result #467614

There is no (32, 94, 64)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24858 643917 398505 199802 146525 > 294

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 95, 64)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction