Information on Result #467614
There is no (32, 94, 64)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24858 643917 398505 199802 146525 > 294
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (32, 95, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |