Information on Result #3021205
There is no (42, 65, 262)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (42, 64, 262)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 18 898327 568102 292544 > 264 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.