Information on Result #466839

There is no (42, 64, 262)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 18 898327 568102 292544 > 264

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (42, 65, 262)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction