Information on Result #3022451
There is no (49, 134, 96)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (49, 133, 96)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12095 592118 854597 698118 263263 774059 167970 > 2133 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.