Information on Result #469057

There is no (49, 133, 96)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12095 592118 854597 698118 263263 774059 167970 > 2133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 134, 96)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction