Information on Result #3024317
There is no (61, 100, 267)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (61, 99, 267)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 644472 876597 704605 873909 080544 > 299 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.