Information on Result #467786

There is no (61, 99, 267)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 644472 876597 704605 873909 080544 > 299

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 100, 267)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction