Information on Result #3024357
There is no (61, 166, 118)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (61, 165, 118)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 58 558641 588513 870108 579887 157479 360967 021396 345303 > 2165 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.