Information on Result #470594
There is no (61, 165, 118)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 58 558641 588513 870108 579887 157479 360967 021396 345303 > 2165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (61, 166, 118)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |