Information on Result #3024910
There is no (65, 120, 195)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (65, 119, 195)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 687813 191562 349689 363821 905328 630544 > 2119 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.