Information on Result #468496
There is no (65, 119, 195)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 687813 191562 349689 363821 905328 630544 > 2119
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 120, 195)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |