Information on Result #3024935
There is no (65, 154, 136)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (65, 153, 136)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13429 003991 622726 182412 176559 551044 813876 943216 > 2153 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.