Information on Result #469984

There is no (65, 153, 136)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13429 003991 622726 182412 176559 551044 813876 943216 > 2153

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 154, 136)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction