Information on Result #469984
There is no (65, 153, 136)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13429 003991 622726 182412 176559 551044 813876 943216 > 2153
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (65, 154, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |