Information on Result #3024939
There is no (65, 162, 131)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (65, 161, 131)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 474308 789546 667914 702947 043496 251888 439640 600968 > 2161 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.