Information on Result #470386
There is no (65, 161, 131)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 474308 789546 667914 702947 043496 251888 439640 600968 > 2161
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 162, 131)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |