Information on Result #3025505
There is no (69, 180, 135)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (69, 179, 135)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 984731 728315 551125 801265 688041 743087 457889 530369 154352 > 2179 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.