Information on Result #471361

There is no (69, 179, 135)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 984731 728315 551125 801265 688041 743087 457889 530369 154352 > 2179

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 180, 135)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction