Information on Result #3026980
There is no (81, 196, 164)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 195, 164)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 60676 546302 717958 463849 477888 982199 437580 913115 629514 089648 > 2195 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.