Information on Result #3026981
There is no (81, 198, 163)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (81, 197, 163)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 255611 027050 778421 931358 595385 540448 229899 952180 298310 184496 > 2197 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.