Information on Result #472439

There is no (81, 197, 163)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 255611 027050 778421 931358 595385 540448 229899 952180 298310 184496 > 2197

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 198, 163)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction