Information on Result #3027072
There is no (82, 167, 200)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (82, 166, 200)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105 372749 128563 001869 765964 967271 647705 798621 293224 > 2166 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.