Information on Result #470657

There is no (82, 166, 200)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105 372749 128563 001869 765964 967271 647705 798621 293224 > 2166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 167, 200)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction