Information on Result #470657
There is no (82, 166, 200)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105 372749 128563 001869 765964 967271 647705 798621 293224 > 2166
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (82, 167, 200)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |