Information on Result #3027087
There is no (82, 185, 176)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (82, 184, 176)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 870635 898419 073256 298165 487564 930414 861136 875172 006136 > 2184 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.