Information on Result #471655

There is no (82, 184, 176)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27 870635 898419 073256 298165 487564 930414 861136 875172 006136 > 2184

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 185, 176)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction