Information on Result #3027214
There is no (83, 220, 159)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (83, 219, 159)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 069466 712751 956019 661581 994334 387109 628641 027960 850581 112331 011190 > 2219 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.