Information on Result #473889

There is no (83, 219, 159)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 069466 712751 956019 661581 994334 387109 628641 027960 850581 112331 011190 > 2219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (83, 220, 159)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction