Information on Result #3027318
There is no (84, 211, 165)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (84, 210, 165)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1786 610185 035015 232577 648689 761863 532547 975137 305301 925426 143104 > 2210 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.