Information on Result #473280
There is no (84, 210, 165)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1786 610185 035015 232577 648689 761863 532547 975137 305301 925426 143104 > 2210
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 211, 165)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |