Information on Result #3027320
There is no (84, 215, 163)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (84, 214, 163)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27188 802145 624149 898594 636897 451796 784851 646550 844597 311298 126344 > 2214 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.