Information on Result #473548

There is no (84, 214, 163)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27188 802145 624149 898594 636897 451796 784851 646550 844597 311298 126344 > 2214

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (84, 215, 163)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction