Information on Result #3027329
There is no (84, 233, 158)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (84, 232, 158)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 9412 195196 031816 859298 489647 329271 685242 298154 850635 412441 834262 455196 > 2232 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.