Information on Result #474813

There is no (84, 232, 158)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 9412 195196 031816 859298 489647 329271 685242 298154 850635 412441 834262 455196 > 2232

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (84, 233, 158)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction