Information on Result #3027397
There is no (85, 168, 217)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 167, 217)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 209 402862 643165 556087 815046 318382 999661 803737 419300 > 2167 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.