Information on Result #3027398
There is no (85, 170, 212)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 169, 212)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 748 602885 726626 685565 542852 092854 259812 380644 506020 > 2169 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.