Information on Result #470820
There is no (85, 169, 212)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 748 602885 726626 685565 542852 092854 259812 380644 506020 > 2169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (85, 170, 212)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |