Information on Result #3027401
There is no (85, 176, 202)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (85, 175, 202)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56794 654958 433460 615152 379789 760537 777087 947463 692560 > 2175 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.