Information on Result #471144

There is no (85, 175, 202)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56794 654958 433460 615152 379789 760537 777087 947463 692560 > 2175

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 176, 202)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction