Information on Result #3027538
There is no (86, 225, 165)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (86, 224, 165)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 30 220144 955176 943963 077018 653173 836646 209469 509699 474483 529265 852884 > 2224 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.