Information on Result #474240
There is no (86, 224, 165)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 30 220144 955176 943963 077018 653173 836646 209469 509699 474483 529265 852884 > 2224
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 225, 165)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |