Information on Result #3027611
There is no (87, 176, 213)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (87, 175, 213)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 50670 504574 020037 291465 009098 666603 545956 519864 159860 > 2175 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.