Information on Result #471145

There is no (87, 175, 213)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 50670 504574 020037 291465 009098 666603 545956 519864 159860 > 2175

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 176, 213)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction