Information on Result #3027637
There is no (87, 216, 172)-net in base 2, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (87, 215, 172)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 60493 634967 989141 979977 419881 810551 267955 026885 635774 596370 219074 > 2215 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.