Information on Result #473617

There is no (87, 215, 172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 60493 634967 989141 979977 419881 810551 267955 026885 635774 596370 219074 > 2215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 216, 172)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction